History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brammer v. State
554 So. 2d 671
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1990
|
Check Treatment
554 So. 2d 671 (1990)

Paul BRAMMER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-01219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 5, 1990.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises error only as to the sentence imposed for count I of his multi-count conviction. He was orally sentenced on that count to five years probation with the first 364 days to be served in county jail. However, appellant's written sentence for count I indicates a sentence of 364 days followed by five years probation.

As the parties agree, when there is a discrepancy between the written sentence and the oral pronouncement of sentence, the latter prevails. See Bogan v. State, 462 So. 2d 115 (Fla.2d DCA 1985). Therefore, we remand with directions to conform the written sentence as to count I to the oral pronouncement of sentence. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Brammer v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 5, 1990
Citation: 554 So. 2d 671
Docket Number: 89-01219
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.