Bramlette v. Paxton, 228 So. 2d 167

Lead Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled “Audrey Paxton v. Hugh T. Bramlette”, 228 So.2d 161, in which a separate decision is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present matter is affirmed insofar as it rejects the demands of Hugh T. Bramlette for restitution of his separate and paraphernal funds. All rights are reserved to both plaintiff and defendant to seek a partition and settlement of the community formerly existing between them. All costs in the lower court, as well as the cost of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant.

Affirmed, as amended.

---

Rehearing

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Bramlette v. Paxton

Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal

Date Published: Oct 30, 1969

Citations: 228 So. 2d 167; 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5887; No. 2818

Docket Number: No. 2818

Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.