282 F. 271 | 8th Cir. | 1922
Error from conviction for violation of section 8 of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Act Dec. 17, 1914, 38 Stat. 789 [Comp. St. § 6287n]).
The sole contention urged here is the insufficiency of the evidence to establish that accused was a “dealer” or a “distributor,” within the meaning of the law. Accused was arrested at the Union Station at
As this is the sole error urged, the judgment is affirmed.
MUNGER, District Judge, dissents.
<g=»For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in ’all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes