History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brainard v. Patterson
21 A.2d 29
Pa.
1941
Check Treatment

This appeal is from a new-trial order made in consequence of the conduct of the court officer in charge of *Page 466 the jury. Toward midnight, after the jury had been deliberating some hours, they inquired of the officer about sleeping accommodations and were informed by him, or understood him to say, they could not separate until after they had agreed on a verdict. Sometime about 2:30 a. m. they found for the defendant. The learned judge held that, in the circumstances, the verdict had been coerced within the rule applied inWelshire v. Bruaw, 331 Pa. 392, 200 A. 67. There was no abuse of discretion. The other questions need not be referred to.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brainard v. Patterson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 13, 1941
Citation: 21 A.2d 29
Docket Number: Appeal, 104
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.