History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bragg v. Wright
120 F. 1018
7th Cir.
1902
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This cause comes before us upon the same testimony that was presented when it was last here. Wright v. Bragg, 37 C. C. A. 574, 96 Fed. 729. It is urged that that judgment was erroneous, and that we should review oun former decision and correct the supposed error. That decision, however, is the. law of the case, and we are without authority, upon this appeal, to disturb that judgment. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Lloyd, 46 C. C. A. 153, 107 Fed. 70; United States Life Ins. Co. of City of New York v. Cable, 39 C. C. A. 264. 98 Fed. 761. The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bragg v. Wright
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Mar 1, 1902
Citation: 120 F. 1018
Docket Number: No. 832
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.