Yulanda Brady (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
