Bradley v. United Wireless Telegraph Co.

83 N.J. Eq. 688 | N.J. | 1914

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Viee-Chancel- ■ lor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Heppenheijtee, Williams — 12.

For reversal — None.