History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bradley v. State
148 S.E. 423
Ga. Ct. App.
1929
Check Treatment
Broyles, G. J.

1. Although (as admitted in the brief of the solicitor-general) the indictment in this case, which charged the offense of perjury, was “grammatically and rhetorically defective,” it was sufficient to withstand the demurrer interposed, and the overruling of the demurrer was not error.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial, which contained the usual general grounds only. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Rosser & Shaw, for plaintiff in error. M. Neil Andrews, soliciior-general, Dean Owens, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Bradley v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 15, 1929
Citation: 148 S.E. 423
Docket Number: 19663
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.