midpage

Bradley v. StateBradley v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 10, 1904
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Evans
Evans, J.

1. “Though the amendment to the motion for a new trial was ‘allowed,’ it does not appear that the trial judge approved or certified its grounds as true. The assignments of error therein can not be considered.” Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202.

2. ■ The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict; it has met with the approval of the trial judge; and as no error of law is made apparent, the judgment denying a hew trial is Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bradley v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 10, 1904
Citations: 121 Ga. 162; 48 S.E. 904; 1904 Ga. LEXIS 63
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In