Bradford v. Moore, 90 Ohio St. 3d 75

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because a “claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction.” State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 259, 260, 719 N.E.2d 545, 546; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bradford v. Moore

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Sep 20, 2000

Citations: 90 Ohio St. 3d 75; 734 N.E.2d 828; No. 00-715

Docket Number: No. 00-715

Court Abbreviation: Ohio