History
  • No items yet
midpage
Braden v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
4:15-cv-04114
W.D. Ark.
Sep 25, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION DAVID BRADEN and DALE BROWN,

individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:15-cv-4114

FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY

GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN DEFENDANT

ORDER The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement of all claims in the above-styled case. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify (ECF No. 43) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Saul Solomon’s March 17, 2017 Declaration (ECF No. 77) and Motion to Exclude Saul Solomon’s Declarations (ECF No. 90) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT . The parties may renew the motions in the event that the parties decide not to settle and to move forward with the lawsuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED , this 25th day of September, 2017.

/s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Braden v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Date Published: Sep 25, 2017
Docket Number: 4:15-cv-04114
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.