History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyle v. Zacharie
31 U.S. 348
SCOTUS
1832
Check Treatment
Mr Chief Justice Marshall said.

The judges who were in the minority of the court upon the general question as to .the constitutionality of state-insolvent'laws, concurred in the opinion of Mr Justice Johnson in the case of Ogden v. Saunders. That opinion is therefore to be deemed the opinion, of the other-judges who. assented to that judgment. Whatever principles are established in that opinion, are to be considered no longer .openTor. controversy, but the settled, law of the court.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyle v. Zacharie
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 1, 1832
Citation: 31 U.S. 348
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.