Boyle v. Zacharie, 31 U.S. 348

Mr Chief Justice Marshall said.

The judges who were in the minority of the court upon the general question as to .the constitutionality of state-insolvent'laws, concurred in the opinion of Mr Justice Johnson in the case of Ogden v. Saunders. That opinion is therefore to be deemed the opinion, of the other-judges who. assented to that judgment. Whatever principles are established in that opinion, are to be considered no longer .openTor. controversy, but the settled, law of the court.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyle v. Zacharie

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Jan 1, 1832

Citations: 31 U.S. 348; 8 L. Ed. 423; 6 Pet. 348; 1832 U.S. LEXIS 479

Court Abbreviation: U.S.