History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyle v. Trump
8:25-cv-01628
D. Maryland
Jun 13, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 8:25-cv-01628-MJM Document 25 Filed 06/13/25 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * MARY BOYLE, et al. , *

* Plaintiffs, * * Civ. No. MJM-25-1628 v. *

* DONALD J. TRUMP, et al. , *

* Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER (cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:87)(cid:75)

For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is this _____ day of June, 2025, by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED; 2. Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) is DENIED; 3. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No.

6) is DENIED as moot; 4. It is DECLARED that President Donald J. Trump’s purported termination of Plaintiffs

Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric, and Richard Trumka Jr. from their roles as Commissioners of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) is ultra vires, contrary to law, and without legal effect; and

5. Defendants Scott Bessent, Russell Vought, and Peter A. Feldman are ENJOINED from

taking any action to effectuate Plaintiffs’ unlawful terminations (until such time as Plaintiffs’ terms expire pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2053), including by: *2 Case 8:25-cv-01628-MJM Document 25 Filed 06/13/25 Page 2 of 2

(cid:120) Barring Plaintiffs’ access to agency resources (including, but not

limited to, Plaintiffs’ office spaces, CPSC telephone and computer equipment, CPSC email accounts, and physical and electronic files) to which Plaintiffs had access prior to May 8, 2025;

(cid:120) Giving effect to the purported termination of Plaintiffs’ staff

members; or (cid:120) Withholding from Plaintiffs and their staff members the pay and

benefits that they were entitled to receive in connection with their roles at the CPSC prior to May 8, 2025.

And it is further ORDERED Plaintiffs’ unopposed Motion for Leave to Waive Requirement Under Local Rule 102.2(a) to Provide Addresses in Complaint Caption (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED.

The Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

Matthew J. Maddox w J Maddox United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Boyle v. Trump
Court Name: District Court, D. Maryland
Date Published: Jun 13, 2025
Docket Number: 8:25-cv-01628
Court Abbreviation: D. Maryland
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.