History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyd v. White Consol. Industries, Inc.
67 F.3d 305
9th Cir.
1995
Check Treatment

67 F.3d 305

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Samuel Joseph BOYD, a Nevada resident, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WHITE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC., dba "WCI Major
Appliance Group," a Delaware Corporation; White
Consolidated Industries "WCI" Acceptance
Corp., a Delaware corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-15189.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1995.
Decided Sept. 26, 1995.

Before: HALL, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

For the reasons stated in the district court's order entered January 11, 1994, the mutual release was effective only as to claims arising from the Transamerica action. Boyd seeks the release of claims held against him by White Consolidated Industries Acceptance Corporation, which arise from a separate and unrelated action. Summary judgment was therefore properly granted.

3

AFFIRMED.

Notes

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd v. White Consol. Industries, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 26, 1995
Citations: 67 F.3d 305; 1995 WL 567624; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32803; 94-15189
Docket Number: 94-15189
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In