62 Miss. 536 | Miss. | 1885
delivered the opinion of the court.
We regard the question presented by this case as settled adversely to the appellant by former adjudications of this court. McAlister v. Jerman, 32 Miss. 142; Chaffe v. Wilson, 59 Miss. 42.
’There is no just distinction between a purchaser of the equity of redemption by an absolute conveyance and one who has a mortgage or deed of trust on it.
Decree affirmed.