midpage

Boyd v. StateBoyd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Feb 26, 1997
No. 95-3337
Versions:687 So. 2d 1389
1997 WL 80091
1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1700
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The state showed by a preponderance' of the evidence that the out-of-state conviction it relied on for the prior felony for habitual violent felony offender status was a conviction of appellant’s. See § 775.084(l)(b), (3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993). With respect to the seoresheet error, the state concedes that the trial court erroneously added points for the victim’s death, an offense for which appellant was not found guilty. See Harris v. State, 658 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). However, we agree with the state that the error was harmless given the trial court’s imposition of the maximum sentence allowable for a habitual violent offender. See Sellers v. State, 578 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA), approved on other grounds, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991).

However, we remand for the trial court to correct the clerical error in the final judgment to show that appellant was convicted of attempted second degree murder in violation of section 782.04(2).

WARNER, STEVENSON and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 26, 1997
Citations: 687 So. 2d 1389; 1997 WL 80091; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1700; No. 95-3337
Docket Number: No. 95-3337
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In