History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyd v. State
158 So. 2d 115
Ala.
1963
Check Treatment

Petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

We have no alternative but to strike the petition because it is not on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 32, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. XIX, XXXI, Code 1940, Tit. 7, 1955 Cumulative Pocket Part, p. 233, Recompiled Code 1958, Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1172; Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham,274 Ala. 613, 149 So.2d 923; Smith v. Smith, 273 Ala. 230,139 So.2d 346; Ex parte Davis, 269 Ala. 58, 110 So.2d 306; Accardo v. State, 268 Ala. 293, 105 So.2d 865; McDonald v. Amason,267 Ala. 654, 104 So.2d 719; Ladd v. State, 266 Ala. 586,98 So.2d 59; Smith v. State, 264 Ala. 264, 86 So.2d 842; Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 124, 57 So.2d 642.

Petition stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 21, 1963
Citation: 158 So. 2d 115
Docket Number: 6 Div. 40
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.