midpage

Boyd v. SchnellBoyd v. Schnell

Appellate Court of Illinois
Dec 21, 1917
Gen. No. 22,910
Reporters:
Before:
McDonald
Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 1060*—when ‍​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‍error cannot be predicated upon giving of an instruction. Error cannot be predicated upon thev giving of an instruction where the record fails to ‍​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‍disclose on whose behalf it was given. 3. Damages, § 200*—when instruction properly refused. An instruction excluding the element of profits held properly refused where there ‍​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‍was no evidence tending to show profits and plaintiff made no claim therefor. 4. Appeal and error, § 1514*—when improper remarles of counsel are not ‍​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‍reversible error. Improper remarks of plaintiff’s counsel in his closing argument to the jury were not reversible error where plaintiff’s recovery was limited to ‍​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‍moneys actually advanced by him, in an action on the common counts.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd v. Schnell
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 21, 1917
Citations: 209 Ill. App. 187; Gen. No. 22,910
Docket Number: Gen. No. 22,910
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In