History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyd v. Schnell
209 Ill. App. 187
Ill. App. Ct.
1917
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 1060*—when error cannot be predicated upon giving of an instruction. Error cannot be predicated upon thev giving of an instruction where the record fails to disclose on whose behalf it was given. 3. Damages, § 200*—when instruction properly refused. An instruction excluding the element of profits held properly refused where there was no evidence tending to show profits and plaintiff made no claim therefor. 4. Appeal and error, § 1514*—when improper remarles of counsel are not reversible error. Improper remarks of plaintiff’s counsel in his closing argument to the jury were not reversible error where plaintiff’s recovery was limited to moneys actually advanced by him, in an action on the common counts.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd v. Schnell
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 21, 1917
Citation: 209 Ill. App. 187
Docket Number: Gen. No. 22,910
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.