History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyd & Phelps v. Seely
2 Wend. 242
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1829
Check Treatment
By the Court, Sutherland, J.

It was irregular to enter a rule for interlocutory judgment until four days in term had intervened after the entry of the default. (8th Rule of April term, 1796.) Besides, there could not have been notice of assessment in this ease, which, and notice of inquiry, cannot be given until after default, though it may be given previous to the entry of rule for interlocutory judgment. (2 Caines, 109. 12 Johns. R. 151.)

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd & Phelps v. Seely
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1829
Citation: 2 Wend. 242
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.