History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bowman v. Tooker
278 A.D. 951
N.Y. App. Div.
1951
Check Treatment

Order denying motion to compel plaintiff to amend the complaint so as to separately state and number causes of action and to make more definite and certain stated allegations thereof affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellants may answer the complaint within ten days after entry of the order hereon. As we read the complaint, it alleges but one cause of action upon a single contract of employment for the amount alleged to be due plaintiff at the commencement of the action, and the reference therein to an account stated for the year 1949 is merely an evidentiary allegation, not the statement of another cause of action. (Leiser v. McDowell, 69 App. Div. 444, 447; Pittsfield Nat. Bank V. Tailer, 60 Hun 130, 131; McKinney V. C. I. T. Corp., 263 App. Div. 1066; Payne v. New York, S. é W. B. B. Co., 201 N. Y. 436, 441.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bowman v. Tooker
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 11, 1951
Citation: 278 A.D. 951
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.