Bowling v. Beaver

269 U.S. 527 | SCOTUS | 1925

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Mr. Dick Rice for defendants in error, in support of the motion.

Messrs. Vern E. Thompson and Halbert H. Mc-Cluer for plaintiffs in error, in- opposition thereto.