History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bowie & Kurtz v. Blacklock
2 Cranch 265
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1821
Check Treatment
The Court (Thruston, J., absent,)

overruled the opinion before given, and instructed the jury that the holder of the note was only bound to call at the usual place of business of the defendant, in business hours; and if it be shut, and no person there to receive notice, the holder is excused for not giving notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Bowie & Kurtz v. Blacklock
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Nov 15, 1821
Citation: 2 Cranch 265
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.