210 N.W. 871 | Minn. | 1926
The case has proceeded and judgment has been ordered for plaintiffs under the rule of Abbott v. Moldestad,
The main argument for defendants is that the statute, G.S. 1923, § 9576, providing for the cancelation by notice of an executory contract for the conveyance of land, provides the exclusive remedy for the vendor. There is nothing in that point and it was decided otherwise in State Bank v. Sylte,
The other points made for defendants are also disposed of adversely to defendants by the cases first above cited.
Order affirmed. *199