32:T498,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Bowers v. Callahan, 754 A.2d 388","datePublished":"2000-06-27","legislationDate":"2000-06-27","citation":"Bowers v. Callahan, 754 A.2d 388 (Md. 2000)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Court of Appeals of Maryland","description":"Read the full text of Bowers v. Callahan (Bowers v. Callahan, 754 A.2d 388 (Md. 2000)). This legal opinion, filed in 2000-06-27, from the Court of Appeals of Maryland discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/bowers-v-callahan--1965002"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/bowers-v-callahan--1965002","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Bowers v. Callahan, Court of Appeals of Maryland, Bowers v. Callahan, 754 A.2d 388 (Md. 2000)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T4ac, *396 PER CURIAM

ORDER.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 27th day of June, 2000,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal. See Shoemaker v. Smith 353 Md. 143, 725 A.2d 549 (1999). See also Dennis v. Folkenberg, 354 Md. 412, 731 A.2d 883 (1999); Samuels v. Tschechtelin, 353 Md. 508, 727 A.2d 929 (1999); Bunting v. State, 312 Md. 472, 540 A.2d 805 (1988). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be divided equally between the parties.

Judge HARRELL did not participate in the consideration of this matter.