Bowen v. StateBowen v. State
In this direct criminal appeal, the appellant challenges costs and a special condition of probation imposed upon his sentencing in April 1996. We strike that portion of the order by which the appellant is directed to pay $100 to the Drug Abuse Trust Fund and $100 to the Florida Crime Lab because the order fails to cite statutory authority for those costs. See, e.g., Fisher v. State,
We also strike the special condition requiring the appellant to pay the costs of drug testing and treatment because the trial court failed to orally pronounce that condition, and it may not be reimposed. See Fisher,
The orders appealed are otherwise affirmed.