History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bowen v. Godfrey
109 N.J.L. 261
N.J.
1932
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodine, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Bowen v. Godfrey
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 16, 1932
Citation: 109 N.J.L. 261
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.