History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bowen v. Farley
113 A.D. 767
N.Y. App. Div.
1906
Check Treatment
Miller, J.:

The plaintiff complained on a balance due for goods sold-and delivered; the defendant counterclaimed a demand for goods returned in excess of the quantity not paid for. The proof developed disputed questions of fact, the determination of which required a judgment either for the plaintiff or for the defendant on his counterclaim. At the close of the whole case the justice dismissed the complaint on the merits. Section 248 of the Municipal Court Act (Laws of 1902, chap. 580) provides for a dismissal without prejudice to a new action, and section 249, so far as material, provides: “ Judgment that the action be dismissed on the merits with costs may be rendered in the folowing cases: 1. Where, at the close of the whole case, the court is of the- opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover as a matter of law.”. It is plain that the dismissal “on. the merits” must have proceeded'on the theory that *768tlie plaintiff was not entitled to recover as matter of law; but a disputed, question of fact could not be disposed of as one of law. -Had the plaintiff entirely failed to prove, his cause of action, .the question would have been one of law, but even then a nonsuit instead of a dismissal on the merits would have been required unless-the justice- could say Upon, tire whole case as. a matter‘of la>w ,tliat the -plaintiff could not recover in any event. By reading together the two sections referred to (supra), their purpose is made obvious; .Where on a' new trial .the- plaintiff might supply some defect 'in- his proof, a honsuit'is proper; where upon the whole case' the justice can see that the plaintiff can never recover as a matter of law; a dismissal on tliemerits is proper. In this case neither one was' proper, but a determination of the disputed questions- of fact was required; The .judgment-of the ‘Municipal- Court must,, therefore, be reversed'and ia- ne-w trial- ordered, costs to abide the event.

Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and,Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of -the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered-, costs to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Bowen v. Farley
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 8, 1906
Citation: 113 A.D. 767
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.