History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bow v. State Highway Commission
246 Ky. 564
| Ky. Ct. App. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

Affirming.

Property belonging to Ellen Bow and eight others was taken for the construction of a highway, and Ellen Bow alone had appealed.

The statement of appeal filed reads, "Ellen Bow et al., Appellants," but such expressions as "et al.," "etc.," "and others," and "c.," are absolutely meaningless in a statement filed under section 739 of the Code of Civil Practice.

No exceptions had been filed to the report of the commissioners; therefore there was no issue made in the trial court and nothing to complain of here.

This concludes no one but Ellen Bow, as she is the only appellant.

Judgment affirmed. *Page 565

Case Details

Case Name: Bow v. State Highway Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Date Published: Dec 16, 1932
Citation: 246 Ky. 564
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.