History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bouldin v. Sheerer
21 Ariz. 247
Ariz.
1920
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. Maricopa County v. Jordan, 7 Ariz. 4, 60 Pac. 693; Gardner v. Gardner, 7 Ariz. 73, 60 Pac. 875; Trimble et al. v. Long, 6 Ariz. 268, 56 Pac. 731; Daggs et al. v. Field, 6 Ariz. 47, 52 Pac. 773; Daggs et al. v. Hoskins et al., 5 Ariz. 236, 52 Pac. 350; Putnam v. Putnam, 3 Ariz. 182, 24 Pac. 320.; Wolfley v. Gila River Irr. Co., 3 Ariz. 176, 24 Pac. 257.

*248The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced. '

The appeal in this case is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bouldin v. Sheerer
Court Name: Arizona Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 25, 1920
Citation: 21 Ariz. 247
Docket Number: Civil No. 1756
Court Abbreviation: Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.