63 So. 2d 273 | Fla. | 1953
‘ The Chancellor entered a final decree cancelling a deed from the appellee-plain-tiff to the appellant-defendant, Dorothy L. Bould, whereupon the defendants brought this appeal. In support of the appeal appellants present three assignments of error magnified into nine questions. However, we find that only the one that “Chancellor erred in making and entering the final decree in this cause on June 6th, 1952,” merits consideration and this we find not .to be sustained.
The only determinative question presented is whether the deed involved was delivered by or on behalf of the grantors,
Affirmed.