History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boudreau v. Eastman
59 N.H. 467
N.H.
1879
Check Treatment

It does not appear to be material whether the plaintiff, or his brother, the undisclosed principal and plaintiff in interest, is plaintiff of record. The writ may be amended by substituting the brother for the plaintiff (Judge of Probate v. Jackson, 58 N.H. 458), or by an entry that the brother appears and prosecutes the action as plaintiff in interest. Folsom v. O. F. Ins. Co., 59 N.H. 54. As neither the course nor the result of the trial would have been affected by such an amendment if it had been made before the trial, it may be made now without a new trial. Roulo v. Valcour, 58 N.H. 347. Let the record show the truth. When the amendment is made, there will be

Judgment for the plaintiff.

SMITE, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 468

Case Details

Case Name: Boudreau v. Eastman
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 467
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.