History
  • No items yet
midpage
Botarf v. State
867 So. 2d 1280
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2004
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s concession of error, for which we commend it, the order finding Botarf in violation of his probation and the sentence imposed thereafter is reversed. On remand, the State may proceed on the original affidavit alleging that Botarf violated his probation, or may amend it. See Ray v. State, 855 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PLEUS, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Botarf v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 26, 2004
Citation: 867 So. 2d 1280
Docket Number: No. 5D03-1072
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.