History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boswell v. Slade
207 Ala. 340
Ala.
1922
Check Treatment

While section 2961 of the Code of 1907, among other things, provides that the plaintiff "must within the first three days of the return term of the attachment file his complaint," it has been held by the previous decisions of this court that this provision is directory, and that the attachment should not be dismissed or dissolved if the complaint is filed at any time before judgment. Perkerson v. Snodgrass, 85 Ala. 137, 4 So. 752; Decatur Nashville Co. v. Crass, 97 Ala. 524, 12 So. 41. This provision has been reproduced without material change in succeeding Codes, and we must assume that it was readopted as construed in the cases supra. Hence the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant's motion to dismiss the attachment.

It is sufficient to say as to appellant's assignment of error No. 2 that there is nothing in the record to show that the motion to tax the plaintiff with the cost was brought to the attention of the trial court, or that a ruling was made upon same.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur. *Page 341

Case Details

Case Name: Boswell v. Slade
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 20, 1922
Citation: 207 Ala. 340
Docket Number: 4 Div. 988.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.