Borski v. StateBorski v. State
Michael P. BORSKI, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*788 Raymond C. Miller of Raymond C. Miller, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
STEVENSON, Judge.
We affirm appellant's convictions for resisting an officer and battery on a law enforcement officer, as we hold that Deputy Poston, after lawfully stopping appellant's vehicle and conducting a field sobriety test, could lawfully order appellant to return to his vehicle for the remainder of the traffic stop.
In Pennsylvania v. Mimms,
We believe that the rationale of Mimms and Wilson applies with equal force to uphold the constitutionality of a police officer's directive to the driver to remain in, or return to, the vehicle during a lawful traffic stop. See United States v. Moorefield,
AFFIRMED.
STONE, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur.