History
  • No items yet
midpage
Borrego v. Kessler
183 So. 2d 695
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1966
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The above styled case was argued before this Court on. February 24, 1966, at which time the question arose as to whether the appeal was timely filed.

It was suggested to the attorneys for each of the parties that briefs be filed on the question of jurisdiction. Such briefs have been filed and it would seem that, under the factual situation, a petition for rehearing was not filed within the ten day period of the recordation of the final decree, which was September 29, 1964. The petition for rehearing was filed and served below on October 13, 1964. Notice of appeal was filed and served December 30, 1964. Since the petition for rehearing was not timely, it would not toll the time for appeal and, therefore, the appeal herein is dismissed. See Ganzer v. Ganzer, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 591; State ex rel. Owens v. Pearson, Fla.1963, 156 So.2d 4; and Kippy Corporation v. Colburn, Fla.1965, 177 So.2d 193.

Dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and PIERCE, J., and LOVE, WM. K., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Borrego v. Kessler
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 4, 1966
Citation: 183 So. 2d 695
Docket Number: No. 5848
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.