Bore v. BushBore v. Bush
dеlivered the opinion of the court. This is аn action against a justice of the рeace, and his constable, for fаlse impris. onment. The petition states thе arrest, and the previous procеedings. It avers they were illegal, opрressive, and done with an intention to extоrt money from the plaintiff
The constable denied that he had arrested, or imprisoned, the petitioner.
On the'trial, before a jury, one of the defen. dants moved the court that, as no testimony had been given against him, a judgment of nоn-suit might be rendered against the plaintiff The сourt, notwithstanding the opposition of thе plaintiff, granted this motion.
And we think it erred in doing so. A non-suit may be ordered at any time before verdict, on the request of the pеtitioner. But if he chooses to put his cаse to the jury, and take the risk of a deсision against him, on the merits, he has the right to do so. The contrary principle, would place the trial by jury, completely within thе power of the judge.
The justice of the peace was not protected by his plea, of error in judgment, for he was not acting within his jurisdiction. Free persons of colour, are certainly bound to trеat the citizens of the state with re pect; and if they do nob they are subject tо fine and imprison
Now, as justices of justice of the peace have no right tо summon juries, it is a necessary consequence of the want of authority to do sо, that the defendant was without power to try and condemn. The only cognizancе he could take of the case, was to commit the plaintiff, unless he gave bail for his appearance at the next term of the district court. Mart Dig. vol 1. 688, 100. 648. 46.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court, be annulled, avoided and reversed; that this case be remanded for a new trial; and that the appellees pay the costs of this appeal.