*1 [Cite as Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc. , 121 Ohio St.3d 358, 2009-Ohio-1392.]
B OOTH ET AL ., A PPELLANTS , v . D UFFY H OMES , I NC ., A PPELLEE . [Cite as Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc. , 121 Ohio St.3d 358, 2009-Ohio-1392.] Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I and cause remanded
for consideration of Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc. (No. 2008-2258 — Submitted February 17, 2009 — Decided April 1, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 07AP-680, 2008-Ohio-5261. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. {¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc. , 121 Ohio St.3d 66, 2009-Ohio-1, 902 N.E.2d 10.
M OYER , C.J., and L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ., concur.
P FEIFER and L ANZINGER , JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal.
__________________ Fusco, Mackey, Mathews & Gill, L.L.P., and Michael J. Fusco, for appellants.
Zeiger, Tigges & Little, L.L.P., John W. Zeiger, Stuart G. Parsell, and Matthew S. Zeiger, for appellee.
______________________