Bonsignore v. BonsignoreBonsignore v. Bonsignore
Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, with costs.
The record supports the Family Court’s determination that, based on a fair preponderance of the credible evidence, the husband engaged in acts which would constitute the offenses of disorderly conduct and harassment, warranting the issuance of the order of protection (see
The husband’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Carni, JJ., concur.