Per Curium.
Dismissed with costs for want of jurisdic*730tion upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U.S. 89" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1905-05-29" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/farrell-v-obrien-96328?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96328">199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1907-03-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/empire-state-idaho-mining--developing-co-v-hanley-96638?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96638">205 U. S. 225, 232; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U.S. 580" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1915-06-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/toop-v-ulysses-land-co-98471?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="98471">237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U.S. 193" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1920-06-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/piedmont-power--light-co-v-town-of-graham-99600?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="99600">253 U. S. 193, 195.
Mr. John Randolph Cooper, with whom Mr. W. O. Cooper, Jr., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. George M. Napier and Mr. Seward M. Smith, for appellee, submitted.