No. 209 | Pa. | May 14, 1888
We agree that the parol sale in this case was of no validity, but after one has been in the notorious, exclusive, and hostile possession of land for half a century, it does' not make much difference whether he claims by parol title or no title at all, for the .statute of limitations conclusively establishes his right.' As to ■whether George Bonnell claimed the fee or only a life estate was a question that was fairly submitted to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.