Bone v. Sands
3:25-cv-00564
E.D. Va.Jan 8, 2026Check TreatmentDocket
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
DAVID BONE,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 3:25¢v564
NURSE SANDS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983action. In order to state a viable claim under42 U.S.C. § 1983
, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,145 F.3d 653, 658
(4th Cir. 1998) (citing42 U.S.C. § 1983
). Plaintiff's current allegations fail to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,550 U.S. 544, 555
(2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson,355 U.S. 41, 47
(1957)). Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on
November 19, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within
thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. (ECF No. 10.) The Court warned Plaintiff that the
failure to submit a particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action.
More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the November 19, 2025
Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond
to the November 19, 2025 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
Date: 6 | 20 Le M. Hannah La
Richmond, Virginia Chief United States District Judge