Bone v. Sands
3:25-cv-00564
E.D. Va.
Jan 8, 2026
Check Treatment
Docket
Case 3:25-cv-00564-MHL-MRC Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RichmondDivision DAVID BONE, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:25cv564 NURSE SANDS, etfl/.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In order to state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, 145 F.3d 653,658 (4th Cir. 1998) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1983). Plaintiffs current allegations fail to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell Atl Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on November 19,2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. (ECF No. 10.) The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit a particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. Case 3:25-cv-00564-MHL-MRC Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 33 More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the November 19, 2025 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the November 19, 2025 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /: Date: i 0 M. HannahLaiMl ^ Richmond! Virginia Chief United Smtes District Judge 2