History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bolton v. Hey
148 Pa. 156
Pa.
1892
Check Treatment
Pee Ctjeiam,

The learned judge of the court below held that the affidavit of defence was sufficient to prevent judgment. In this we think he was right. The case comes directly within the ruling in Schroeder v. Galland, 134 Pa. 277. Indeed, the contract appears to have been drawn with reference to that decision, as its language is identical with the opinion of Mr. Justice G reen. We adhere to the law of that case. It follows that the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bolton v. Hey
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 28, 1892
Citation: 148 Pa. 156
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 214
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.