83 Neb. 21 | Neb. | 1908
By remonstrance the appellants objected to the issuance of a liquor license to the appellees because they, as former licensees, had violated section 29, ch. 50, Comp. St. 1907, by failing to keep the windows and doors of their place of business unobstructed by screens. The building where they had been doing business faced the north. On either side of the front door was a large glass window. . The counter was near the east wall,' and ran to within about 10 feet of the north window. • Against the north end of the counter,- and forming a right angle therewith, was a screen 32 or 48 inches Avide. In the west wall of the building, and next to an alley, were two windoAvs at which curtains were maintained, which were sometimes draAvn and sometimes open. The evidence sIioavs that one standing on the sidewalk at the north end of the building could look through the east Avindow and see the bar, but could not see the space in front of the bar, except at the extreme south end thereof; that, looking through the
We recommend that the judgment of the district court affirming the order of the city council granting the license be reversed and this cause remanded, with directions to the lower court to enter judgment canceling said license.
By the Court: For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, this cause is reversed and remanded to the lower court, with instructions to enter an order canceling the license granted by the city council.
Reversed.