History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boling v. Barnes
225 So. 2d 510
Fla.
1969
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District reported at 216 So.2d 804, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and other District Courts of Appeal.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS, and BOYD, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Boling v. Barnes
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 30, 1969
Citation: 225 So. 2d 510
Docket Number: No. 38236
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.