Bolden v. State, 0-428

0-428 | Ind. | Jan 19, 1956

235 Ind. 695" date_filed="1956-01-19" court="Ind." case_name="Bolden v. State">235 Ind. 695 (1956) 131 N.E.2d 301" date_filed="1956-01-13" court="Ind." case_name="Anderson v. Anderson">131 N.E.2d 301

BOLDEN
v.
STATE OF INDIANA.

No. 0-428.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Filed January 19, 1956.

Emmitt W. Bolden, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has again attempted an appeal to this court under Rule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of errors nor proper bill of exceptions, nor do they in any other manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.

The assignment of errors constitutes petitioner's complaint in this court. It is a requisite to any appeal, and without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon this court. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248" date_filed="1952-01-16" court="Ind." case_name="Davis v. Pelley">230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N.E.2d 910.

The petition herein is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Petition dismissed.

NOTE. — Reported in 131 N.E.2d 301.