History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boileau v. De Cecco
323 A.2d 449
N.J.
1974
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N. J. Super. 263.

*235For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford — 7.

For reversal — Fone.

Case Details

Case Name: Boileau v. De Cecco
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 10, 1974
Citation: 323 A.2d 449
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In