1 F. 469 | E.D. Ark. | 1880
The precise question in this case, on the agreed facts, is whether a sole surviving partner can make a valid transfer by deed of trust in the nature of a mortgage of personal property, belonging to the partnership, to secure the payment of a partnership debt.
During the continuance of a partnership one partner may transfer personal property by way of mortgage as security for a partnership debt. Milton v. Mosher, 7 Met. 244; Patch v. Wheatland, 8 Allen, 102; Anderson v. Tompkins, 1 Brock. (Marshall’s Decs.) 456; Harrison v. Sterry, 5 Cranch, 289.
On the dissolution of partnership by the death of one copartner, the right to the possession and control of the partnership effects vests in the survivor, for the purpose of settling up the
And the right and power of the sole surviving partner to dispose of the partnership effects, in settlement of the partnership business, is not limited to the right to make an absolute sale of the same, but he may transfer the choses in action and other personal property, byway of pledge or mortgage, to secure a partnership debt; and, when such transfer is made in good faith, it is effectual against all other creditors, as well as the representatives of the deceased partner. Lorillard v. Lorillard, 4 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.) 210; Hitchcock v. St. John, 1 Hoff. Ch. 511; Wilson v. Soper, 13 B. Mon. 411.
No fraud is charged or proven. The case turns on the question of the power of a sole surviving partner, acting in good'faith, to secure a partnership debt by giving a mortgage or other lien on personal property. His right to do so is not open to serious question.
The lien of the deed of trust is prior in point of time, and therefore paramount to the lien of the execution; and the money arising from the sale of the wharf-boat must be paid to the beneficiary under the deed of trust.
