History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boggs Avenue
152 Pa. 135
Pa.
1893
Check Treatment

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Williams,

This case is ruled by Travers’s Appeal, decided at the present term. The sixth exception to the report should have been sustained by the court below and the report set aside or recommitted, that an assessment of costs and expenses might be made upon the basis pointed out in Bingaman v. The city of Pittsburgh, 29 W. N. 364, 147 Pa. 353.

The decree is set aside at the costs of the appellee and a procedendo awarded.

Case Details

Case Name: Boggs Avenue
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 3, 1893
Citation: 152 Pa. 135
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 122
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.