History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boehm v. Botsford
52 Ark. 400
Ark.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

tax Sales. All inquiry as to the validity of the plaintiff's tax title was cut off by the decree of confirmation of the tax sale under which their title was acquired. Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark., 118; Buckingham v. Hallett, 24 Ark., 519; McCarter v. Neil, 50 ib., 188.

The court adjudged the defendant’s subsequent tax title invalid upon proof which has not been brought upon the record, and we cannot inquire into the correctness of the finding.

Affirm.

Case Details

Case Name: Boehm v. Botsford
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 15, 1889
Citation: 52 Ark. 400
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.