Boehm v. Botsford, 52 Ark. 400

Boehm v. Botsford

52 Ark. 400 | Ark. | 1889

Per Curiam.

tax Sales. All inquiry as to the validity of the plaintiff's tax title was cut off by the decree of confirmation of the tax sale under which their title was acquired. Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark., 118; Buckingham v. Hallett, 24 Ark., 519; McCarter v. Neil, 50 ib., 188.

The court adjudged the defendant’s subsequent tax title invalid upon proof which has not been brought upon the record, and we cannot inquire into the correctness of the finding.

Affirm.